Home › Forums › Current Events › Humans Control Element Energy Sys – Oil based vs Green Energy vs Nuclear Fusion
Tagged: control element, energy system, green energy, nuclear fusion, oil
I would like to share this Interview with you for further discussion of the topic – what are your thoughts on this?
293. Interviewer:
What about control through energy?
294. Alexander Laurent:
Yes, that is another subject in itself. So, another part of this control system is the apparent resource dependency on oil, petrol and the cost-intensive production of electricity. … The dependence on oil and the complicated and expensive production of electricity are deliberate because global corporations, the energy cartels, profit from them. These cartels dominate and manipulate the energy supply of the world market, and for decades for monetary, monopoly and control reasons have undermined progress in the development of other, more efficient methods of energy production, notably nuclear fusion.
Nuclear fusion, an energy with an eerie sounding name – partly due to a deliberate lack of advertising and education in the media. Many therefore consider nuclear fusion to be just as dangerous as nuclear fission, and out of ignorance confuse it with it in principle. If you ask people about it, they seldom know what it is, let alone can answer that it is an energy source that is so cheap, extremely clean and so efficient and effective that no one on this planet even has to pay for it. Just as unknown is that it would take only a few nuclear fusion reactors in the world to supply the whole of humanity with energy without limits and free of charge, in all technical fields, all around.
Unfortunately, few people have any idea what infinite energy, which is available free of charge and infinitely for everyone, would mean for every individual. Hardly anyone is aware of the technological development potential that this holds in all disciplines. The traditional monetary, economic and financial sector, which sucks people dry, would then be practically superfluous or extremely in need of reform and would inevitably be dismantled. This makes it clear that club and nobility are the immediate reason why nuclear fusion is not getting off the ground. After all, of course, the energy cartels are not causally controlled by any elite, but ultimately always by the club and digital nobility. Nuclear fusion is sabotaged. It will only come when, after the catastrophes that are to be initiated, control over humanity has been tightened very firmly. Take a look at the reports about test nuclear fusion reactors in the media. Never before has there been such a hopeful aspect of development that has proceeded so lazily and calmly. Thin and brittle are the reports about it; weak and unmotivated are the works on it; lousy are the excuses for the alleged lack of progress, that every attentive person can see the intent of the abduction.
295. Interviewer:
And what about green energy production then? Isn’t that something progressive for mankind? Doesn’t it also have development potential?
296. Alexander Laurent:
For the energy cartels, the media application of green technologies for electricity generation is merely a means of continuing to control energy production and supply, by distracting from or blocking the feasibility of revolutionary alternative energy production methods, such as nuclear fusion, in the media.
And this works because green energy technology usually has a positive effect on the average human being. Because it is supposedly clean, it creates new jobs and it is something people have always wanted to enforce. Green energy is not really clean, if you look at the production and maintenance costs for wind turbines, for example. It does not create new jobs either, it is just a long-term redistribution of jobs and the creation of other training occupations. This alone makes these technologies the most expensive energy production methods ever.
But it is precisely this very labour- and cost-intensive technology that is very useful for the elite in other respects; it generates new credit money in this way and the collapse of the economic and financial mafia can thus be delayed a little longer for the club until the envisaged date of the apocalypse. Above all, however, it can be used to suppress genuine alternatives and revolutionary methods of energy production, such as nuclear fusion, because that is exactly what is needed now, at this time, to change something about the control of the system. Because after the catastrophes that are to be initiated, nuclear fusion will be on the table anyway, but then it will be there to implement absolute control over humanity, as a special treat, so to speak, for the new lightness of life, even if this life is then under absolute control – with carrot and stick, that is. Nuclear fusion would have to be implemented now, at this time, so that we can become free through it. … This is what led the elite to take up the subject of green energy production and to support it in the media. They took up the issue and thereby supported the nobility and the club in a good way.
297. Interviewer:
So green energy is actually no good at all?
298. Alexander Laurent:
Green energy is absolutely regressive, inefficient, expensive and only there to control the system. It is silly if you know the real reasons for its implementation and the media propaganda behind it. It does not set people free, but keeps them under the yoke of scarce energy. Green technology has nothing to do with progress, nothing at all, on the contrary, but the normal brain-sabotaged human beings do not understand this, because they think it is something that has finally become accepted because they have fought for it. And they continue to argue that it is so clean, which is not true in detail. They continue to argue that there are no other technologically safe and clean ways to produce energy. If they are then made aware of the power and monetary cartels and the system behind them, they justify themselves by saying that somebody should always be in charge of energy management. They believe it would be like public utilities that simply manage and distribute energy. That is how simple the average person thinks.
With nuclear fusion, the production of energy-intensive food would no longer be a problem, or the production of products that were previously unprofitable. Space travel, colonisation of foreign celestial bodies, energy-intensive transport systems, production of all kinds of goods and commodities by energy-eating molecular transformers, and the discovery of new fields of science would be further potential of nuclear fusion. Progress and prosperity, social prosperity. Dissolution of oppressive systems of rulers and social and financial hotbeds, gigantic developments. … This means that people would have to take to the streets not only for groundbreaking free energy production methods, but also for the suppression and undermining of nuclear fusion, also to make it clear to the elites that they know that the development and implementation is manipulated. The people must stand up for the implementation of nuclear fusion. Nuclear fusion must be implemented at the same time as free energy production methods if freedom is to be achieved at all. Because “free” energy production methods alone will not be able to cover the mass of energy requirements in all areas. Industrially produced energy is always needed for industry and certain power ranges, which can be offered in enormous quantities.
But nuclear fusion is being talked out of the public debate because it is said that it is not yet working properly or would be uncontrollable. That more time and research are needed, which is a badly formulated lie. But the media use of the misleading term “uncontrollable” alone is enough to push nuclear fusion out of the public discussion misleadingly over the label “dangerous”. Omission, misinterpretation and information play a major role here. “Not controllable” does not mean the uncontrollability of a dangerous process, but the lack of technical implementation of a stable fusion which is necessary to be able to generate electricity at all. This does not therefore mean core meltdown or the like. For many people the blinkers close just hearing the word “core”, they immediately associate it with nuclear fission. That is a real shame.